...I once wrote a story in which she was personified. And someone asked me what she looked like, and I said as old as she was, and they asked how old was she?, and I said at least thousands of years, and later on I realized the thickheadedness of this answer. How old was Time?? I said thousands of years old. She is, by any calculations, at least some billions. But it's hard for any of us to grasp the idea that there might not have been Time long ago... And even in this very sentence I have to refer to Time. Time is essential to us, and you will find that in every sentence of this paragraph, I mentioned Time at least once, referred to it. That's because we're so used to relating Time to things we did, saw, said...and imagining a universe without Time, a non-universe, a nonexistence I should say, is almost inconceivable. Time must have been born sometime... Think of the irony of that: that you have to connect the birth of a concept to the concept itself, although it hadn't existed up until that point.
“Once upon a time there were four girls. One was pretty. One was clever. One charming, and one…was mysterious. But they were all damaged, you see. Something not right about the lot of them. Bad blood. Big dreams… One by one, night after night, the girls came together. And they sinned… Their sin was that they believed. Believed they could be different. Special. They believed they could change what they were – damaged, unloved. Cast-off things… They were misled. Betrayed by their own stupid hopes…. So life took them, led them, and they went along, you see? They faded before their own eyes, till they were nothing more than living ghosts, haunting each other with what could be. What can’t be… There, now. Isn’t that the scariest story you’ve ever heard?”
"Time's funny. When you're a kid, it passes slowly, and next thing you're fifty and your childhood fits into a rusty little box."
What they said:
This kind of struck me when watching the movie.
[link]
Time itself is entirely a function of memory (storage and retrieval), which creates the illusion that we're on a timeline, always moving from the past into the future.
Think about that. Wouldn't that make this possible?
Be open minded.
What I said:
Time is a convenient way for us to relate a sequence of events to something we can grasp. It's not a TANGIBLE thing, but it's real. I mean, we really are always moving into the future, we grow, there's a certain order of events, and there is no way to go back into the past and change things that already occurred; THAT in itself isn't an illusion. Memory is what would give us our VIEW of time, how we measure it in relation to ourselves, but that doesn't mean we're all just imagining that there's such a thing as time. Memory's the only way to understand the concept of time, but sometimes it's a bit like pounding this huge, abstract mass to fit into a little convenient-sized box.
It is, however, possible that our memories portray a picture that is different than how it really is, that it creates fabrications once the moment is passed, since now is only NOW, one tiny second. And then it's past, too, and we rely on our memories to say, "Oh, I was doing this a few minutes ago," and so on and so forth. If you think in general terms, "now" could be today, or this week, or this month, or year. In reality, it...hardly exists at all. We only know what we remember. Our lives pretty much just consist of our memories.